← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sam Schultz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-02-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Dauphin Kings MJHL 56 4 23 27 0.482 0.0928 0.0898 0.3040 0.2942
2016-17 Virden Oil Capitals MJHL 56 2 22 24 0.429 0.0825 0.0758 0.2703 0.2484
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Saint Mary's (MN) D1 MIAC SR 9 0 2 2 0.222
2020-21 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SR 9 0 2 2 0.222
2019-20 Saint Mary's (MN) D1 MIAC JR 24 2 2 4 0.167
2019-20 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC JR 24 2 2 4 0.167
2018-19 Wisconsin-Superior D1 BigTen SO 9 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen SO 9 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 14 1 1 2 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2017-18 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+86.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13890
Defenseman overall
#1880
Defenseman born in 1996
#1029
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Albertus Magnus · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2021-22
0.259 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Babson · 2017-18
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.