IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Walker Harris Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-10-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 41 26 28 54 1.317 0.2826 0.2886 0.6450 0.6587
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SR 27 13 20 33 1.222
2018-19 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC JR 26 19 12 31 1.192
2017-18 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SO 26 9 14 23 0.885
2016-17 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC FR 26 9 12 21 0.808
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.81
2016-17 · Wesleyan
+227.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11794
Forward overall
#457
Forward born in 1996
#38
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Judd Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Szajner
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Reuschlein
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Strong
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Fossen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Boyd
St. Norbert · 2004-05
1.033 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Lee
SUNY Brockport · 2024-25
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Orem
Johnson & Wales · 2016-17
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.