IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cam Wright Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-08-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Premier-Classic 35 6 4 10 0.286 0.0802 0.0817 0.2353 0.2396
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Stonehill D2 NE10 SR 29 17 13 30 1.034
2018-19 Stonehill D2 NE10 JR 26 11 11 22 0.846
2017-18 Stonehill D2 NE10 SO 25 4 10 14 0.560
2016-17 Stonehill D2 NE10 FR 26 8 11 19 0.731
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.73
2016-17 · Stonehill
+945.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#50896
Forward overall
#2419
Forward born in 1996
#262
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nicolas Poirier
Plymouth State · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Henderson
Western New England · 2009-10
0.765 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Geric Brodt
Wentworth · 2005-06
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.