IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dionne Demke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-12-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Winkler Flyers MJHL 18 1 3 4 0.222 0.0428 0.0453 0.1401 0.1482
2016-17 Kirkland Lake Gold Miners NOJHL 21 2 8 10 0.476 0.0795 0.0798 0.1982 0.1989
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Neumann D3 MAC GR 25 3 3 6 0.240
2021-22 Neumann D3 MAC SR 25 4 8 12 0.480
2020-21 Neumann D1 MAC JR 6 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Neumann D3 MAC JR 6 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Neumann D1 MAC SO 26 0 2 2 0.077
2019-20 Neumann D3 MAC SO 26 0 2 2 0.077
2018-19 Neumann D1 MAC FR 9 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Neumann D3 MAC FR 9 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#45615
Forward overall
#2267
Forward born in 1997
#1209
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Perrone
UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Golka
St. Scholastica · 2013-14
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Sewecke
St. Olaf · 2022-23
0.809 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.