IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brett Strawn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-11-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier-Classic 41 6 8 14 0.342 0.1026 0.1058 0.2813 0.2901
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 SR 25 4 5 9 0.360
2018-19 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 JR 27 9 14 23 0.852
2017-18 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 SO 24 7 22 29 1.208
2016-17 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 FR 27 6 7 13 0.481
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2016-17 · Southern New Hampshire
+431.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#37503
Forward overall
#1601
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Himley
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Erik Baskin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Air Force (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Braden Brown
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Damien Dangueuger
Western New England · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Knoepke
Wisconsin-Stout · 2007-08
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.