IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Erik Baskin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-10-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 57 15 10 25 0.439 0.1629 0.1643 0.4644 0.4683
2013-14 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 56 21 16 37 0.661 0.2453 0.2350 0.6995 0.6702
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Air Force D1 AHA SR 43 16 12 28 0.651
2016-17 Air Force D1 AHA JR 42 11 12 23 0.548
2015-16 Air Force D1 AHA SO 35 12 12 24 0.686
2014-15 Air Force D1 AHA FR 29 10 9 19 0.655
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.66
2014-15 · Air Force
+270.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18796
Forward overall
#714
Forward born in 1993
#1679
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zac Boyle
Neumann · 2016-17
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cory Mozak
Wisconsin-Stout · 2004-05
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cody Pisarczyk
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2024-25
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.