IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Wyatt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-08-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Philadelphia Flyers Elite USPHL-Premier-Classic 49 6 11 17 0.347 0.0974 0.1040 0.2857 0.3051
2015-16 Philadelphia Flyers Elite USPHL-Premier-Classic 34 10 10 20 0.588 0.1651 0.1682 0.4844 0.4935
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Wesleyan D1 — SR 18 9 4 13 0.722
2019-20 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SR 18 9 4 13 0.722
2018-19 Wesleyan D1 — JR 26 7 13 20 0.769
2018-19 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC JR 26 7 13 20 0.769
2017-18 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SO 26 9 16 25 0.962
2016-17 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC FR 17 3 10 13 0.765
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.76
2016-17 · Wesleyan
+526.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#39005
Forward overall
#1707
Forward born in 1996
#161
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Reuschlein
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ron Lindgren
Aurora · 2012-13
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Neduzak
Wisconsin-Superior · 2011-12
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeffrey Gauld
Canton · 2016-17
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.