← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dominic Brenza Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-04-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Hartford Jr. Wolfpack EHL 32 3 10 13 0.406 0.0938 0.0976 0.1988 0.2068
2014-15 Connecticut Jr. Rangers USPHL-Premier-Classic 48 10 8 18 0.375 0.1053 0.1056 0.3083 0.3091
2015-16 Connecticut Jr. Rangers USPHL-Premier-Classic 44 12 22 34 0.773 0.2169 0.2069 0.6353 0.6059
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Stevenson D1 MAC SR 28 6 26 32 1.143
2019-20 Stevenson D3 MAC SR 28 6 26 32 1.143
2018-19 Stevenson D1 MAC JR 18 2 14 16 0.889
2018-19 Stevenson D3 MAC JR 18 2 14 16 0.889
2017-18 Stevenson D3 MAC SO 26 9 16 25 0.962
2016-17 Stevenson D3 MAC FR 24 4 7 11 0.458
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2016-17 · Stevenson
+221.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#34362
Forward overall
#1402
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2015-16
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2021-22
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.