IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dominic Brenza Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-04-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Hartford Jr. Wolfpack EHL 32 3 10 13 0.406 0.0872 0.0907 0.1989 0.2069
2014-15 Connecticut Jr. Rangers USPHL-Premier-Classic 48 10 8 18 0.375 0.1126 0.1129 0.3089 0.3097
2015-16 Connecticut Jr. Rangers USPHL-Premier-Classic 44 12 22 34 0.773 0.2320 0.2213 0.6365 0.6070
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Stevenson D3 MAC SR 28 6 26 32 1.143
2018-19 Stevenson D3 MAC JR 18 2 14 16 0.889
2017-18 Stevenson D3 MAC SO 26 9 16 25 0.962
2016-17 Stevenson D3 MAC FR 24 4 7 11 0.458
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2016-17 · Stevenson
+200.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25837
Forward overall
#1045
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dakota Zarudny
SUNY Geneseo · 2021-22
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Dicker
Arcadia · 2021-22
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dakota Ulmer
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.