IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matthew Toombs Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-08-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 New England Wolves EHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2015-16 New England Wolves EHL 27 6 3 9 0.333 0.0770 0.0743 0.1631 0.1574
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Franklin Pierce D1 NE10 SR 28 1 5 6 0.214
2019-20 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SR 28 1 5 6 0.214
2018-19 Franklin Pierce D1 NE10 JR 26 4 7 11 0.423
2018-19 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 JR 26 4 7 11 0.423
2017-18 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SO 24 2 6 8 0.333
2016-17 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 FR 18 7 3 10 0.556
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2016-17 · Franklin Pierce
+773.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#43438
Forward overall
#1860
Forward born in 1995
#1827
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tucker Ross
University of New England · 2014-15
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
John Mulvihill II
Tufts · 2021-22
0.217 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Huss
Anna Maria · 2017-18
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.