IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tucker Ross Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-08-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier-Classic 44 5 7 12 0.273 0.0765 0.0741 0.2242 0.2172
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 University of New England D1 CNE SR 24 5 3 8 0.333
2018-19 University of New England D3 CNE SR 24 5 3 8 0.333
2017-18 University of New England D3 CNE JR 28 10 10 20 0.714
2016-17 University of New England D3 CNE SO 22 8 8 16 0.727
2015-16 University of New England D3 CNE FR 26 5 10 15 0.577
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2015-16 · University of New England
+724.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21080
Defenseman overall
#2195
Defenseman born in 1994
#270
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jordan Tredinnick
Wisconsin-Stout · 2010-11
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris McGrath
Wilkes · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Angelo
Elmira · 2011-12
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.