IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Patullo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-04-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 36 5 3 8 0.222 0.0325 0.0338 0.1089 0.1132
2014-15 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 32 4 11 15 0.469 0.0686 0.0681 0.2299 0.2282
2015-16 — EHL 32 3 1 4 0.125 0.0183 0.0174 0.0613 0.0582
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Worcester State D1 — SR 26 1 8 9 0.346
2019-20 Worcester State D3 MASCAC SR 26 1 8 9 0.346
2018-19 Worcester State D1 — JR 25 6 10 16 0.640
2018-19 Worcester State D3 MASCAC JR 25 6 10 16 0.640
2017-18 Worcester State D3 MASCAC SO 23 5 12 17 0.739
2016-17 Worcester State D3 MASCAC FR 25 4 6 10 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2016-17 · Worcester State
+1138.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#48668
Forward overall
#2119
Forward born in 1995
#2287
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jonathan Spada
Wentworth · 2014-15
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Shawn Montgomery
Suffolk · 2017-18
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Riddell
New England College · 2005-06
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.