← New Search ↗ Social Card

Levi Cudmore Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-06-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 51 23 20 43 0.843 0.2292 0.2258 0.5313 0.5233
2017-18 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 60 31 41 72 1.200 0.3263 0.3056 0.7562 0.7082
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SR 23 3 4 7 0.304
2020-21 Wisconsin-Superior D1 BigTen JR 10 3 5 8 0.800
2020-21 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen JR 10 3 5 8 0.800
2019-20 Wisconsin-Superior D1 BigTen SO 24 4 4 8 0.333
2019-20 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen SO 24 4 4 8 0.333
2018-19 Wisconsin-Superior D1 BigTen FR 24 3 1 4 0.167
2018-19 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen FR 24 3 1 4 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2018-19 · Wisconsin-Superior
-28.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17015
Forward overall
#750
Forward born in 1997
#159
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Western New England · 2024-25
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2000-01
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2024-25
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.