IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brian Brooks Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-06-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Express Hockey Club EHL 35 4 7 11 0.314 0.0460 0.0464 0.1541 0.1553
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Suffolk D1 — SR 25 5 12 17 0.680
2019-20 Suffolk D3 CNE SR 25 5 12 17 0.680
2018-19 Suffolk D1 — JR 23 5 10 15 0.652
2018-19 Suffolk D3 CNE JR 23 5 10 15 0.652
2017-18 Suffolk D3 CNE SO 25 11 15 26 1.040
2016-17 Suffolk D3 CNE FR 13 3 4 7 0.538
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2016-17 · Suffolk
+1256.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#44316
Forward overall
#2007
Forward born in 1996
#1927
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kimball Johnson
St. Thomas · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jesse Kessler
Hamline · 2012-13
0.345 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Dylan Plitt
Neumann · 2013-14
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.