IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Max Cavallini Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-09-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Kirkland Lake Gold Miners NOJHL 22 5 7 12 0.545 0.0777 0.0772 0.2271 0.2256
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SR 8 0 1 1 0.125
2020-21 Lake Forest D1 NCHA JR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Lake Forest D3 NCHA JR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Lake Forest D1 NCHA SO 13 1 1 2 0.154
2019-20 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SO 13 1 1 2 0.154
2018-19 Lake Forest D1 NCHA FR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Lake Forest D3 NCHA FR 2 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#50070
Forward overall
#2556
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Antonucci
SUNY Oswego · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ty Proffitt
Wisconsin-Superior · 2017-18
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Blair Falotico
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.