← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ty Proffitt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-10-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 14 1 0 1 0.071 0.0254 0.0256 0.0753 0.0760
2018-19 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 53 8 8 16 0.302 0.1073 0.1034 0.3184 0.3069
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC GR 11 0 2 2 0.182
2022-23 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SR 23 1 2 3 0.130
2021-22 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC JR 16 1 5 6 0.375
2020-21 Wisconsin-Superior D1 BigTen SO 7 2 1 3 0.429
2020-21 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen SO 7 2 1 3 0.429
2019-20 Wisconsin-Superior D1 BigTen FR 16 4 1 5 0.312
2019-20 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen FR 16 4 1 5 0.312
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2019-20 · Wisconsin-Superior
+404.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#46555
Forward overall
#2522
Forward born in 1998
#5211
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Potsdam · 2005-06
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2021-22
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2008-09
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.