IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matthew Bernot Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-10-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Syracuse Jr. Stars USPHL-Elite 42 12 31 43 1.024 0.0763 0.0768 0.2346 0.2360
2015-16 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 41 18 20 38 0.927 0.1356 0.1319 0.4544 0.4420
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE — 25 8 12 20 0.800
2018-19 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE — 25 8 6 14 0.560
2017-18 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC — 16 2 3 5 0.312
2016-17 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC — 24 3 3 6 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2016-17 · Skidmore
+166.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19219
Forward overall
#725
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zach Blake
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2010-11
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gabriel Filion
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2024-25
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dan Cecka
Wisconsin-Stout · 2009-10
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.