IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tim Allen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-05-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 — USPHL-Premier-Classic 38 10 7 17 0.447 0.1256 0.1263 0.3679 0.3701
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Skidmore D1 SUNYAC SR 24 2 6 8 0.333
2019-20 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SR 24 2 6 8 0.333
2018-19 Skidmore D1 SUNYAC JR 26 7 7 14 0.538
2018-19 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC JR 26 7 7 14 0.538
2017-18 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SO 21 4 9 13 0.619
2016-17 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC FR 15 1 5 6 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2016-17 · Skidmore
+270.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#41594
Forward overall
#1841
Forward born in 1996
#179
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Blake Gutterman
Finlandia · 2018-19
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Colton Brausen
Wisconsin-Stout · 2014-15
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Challier
Manhattanville · 2009-10
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.