IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Mangone Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-11-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 P.A.L. Junior Islanders USPHL-Premier-Classic 33 5 8 13 0.394 0.1106 0.1142 0.3239 0.3344
2015-16 P.A.L. Junior Islanders USPHL-Premier-Classic 43 13 7 20 0.465 0.1306 0.1284 0.3824 0.3760
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Nichols D3 CNE SR 27 9 5 14 0.518
2018-19 Nichols D3 CNE JR 26 6 5 11 0.423
2017-18 Nichols D3 CNE SO 30 5 6 11 0.367
2016-17 Nichols D3 CNE FR 25 2 3 5 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2016-17 · Nichols
+90.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#42207
Forward overall
#1790
Forward born in 1995
#191
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ian Zaleski
Becker · 2018-19
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Kochanowski
Bethel · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Rogers
Manhattanville · 2022-23
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.