IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Flynn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-06-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Connecticut Jr. Rangers USPHL-Premier-Classic 32 3 1 4 0.125 0.0351 0.0355 0.1028 0.1039
2015-16 Connecticut Jr. Rangers USPHL-Premier-Classic 38 2 5 7 0.184 0.0517 0.0497 0.1514 0.1456
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Worcester State D3 MASCAC — 15 3 2 5 0.333
2016-17 Worcester State D3 MASCAC — 10 2 2 4 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2016-17 · Worcester State
+961.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#58771
Forward overall
#2713
Forward born in 1995
#334
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nathaniel McFarlane
Arcadia · 2024-25
0.217 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Joey Sollazzo
SUNY Potsdam · 2016-17
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Klaren
Wisconsin-Stout · 2004-05
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.