IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joey Sollazzo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-06-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Nepean Raiders CCHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2013-14 Nepean Raiders CCHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2014-15 Navan Grads CCHL 56 5 8 13 0.232 0.0503 0.0515 0.1796 0.1841
2015-16 Navan Grads CCHL 60 12 14 26 0.433 0.0940 0.0918 0.3352 0.3273
2016-17 Navan Grads CCHL 48 11 16 27 0.562 0.1220 0.1127 0.4352 0.4021
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Potsdam D1 — JR 26 3 7 10 0.385
2019-20 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC JR 26 3 7 10 0.385
2018-19 Potsdam D1 — SO 23 3 2 5 0.217
2018-19 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SO 23 3 2 5 0.217
2017-18 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC FR 23 4 2 6 0.261
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2017-18 · SUNY Potsdam
+192.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#38195
Forward overall
#1667
Forward born in 1996
#987
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kyle Rimbach
St. Olaf · 2015-16
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Bourne
Fredonia · 2011-12
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Gauld
Concordia · 2014-15
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.