icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | Nepean Raiders | CCHL | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2013-14 | Nepean Raiders | CCHL | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2014-15 | Navan Grads | CCHL | 56 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 0.232 | 0.0662 | 0.0678 | 0.1797 | 0.1842 |
| 2015-16 | Navan Grads | CCHL | 60 | 12 | 14 | 26 | 0.433 | 0.1237 | 0.1208 | 0.3354 | 0.3275 |
| 2016-17 | Navan Grads | CCHL | 48 | 11 | 16 | 27 | 0.562 | 0.1605 | 0.1483 | 0.4354 | 0.4023 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | SUNY Potsdam | D3 | — | JR | 26 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 0.385 |
| 2018-19 | SUNY Potsdam | D3 | — | SO | 23 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0.217 |
| 2017-18 | SUNY Potsdam | D3 | — | FR | 23 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 0.261 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.