IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Wild Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-11-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 35 2 7 9 0.257 0.0552 0.0563 0.1259 0.1284
2015-16 New York Apple Core EHL 31 4 17 21 0.677 0.1454 0.1419 0.3317 0.3238
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Post D2 NE10 SR 23 2 5 7 0.304
2018-19 Post D2 NE10 JR 25 7 10 17 0.680
2017-18 Post D2 NE10 SO 22 4 9 13 0.591
2016-17 Post D2 NE10 FR 6 1 2 3 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2016-17 · Post
+442.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#36176
Forward overall
#1536
Forward born in 1995
#1003
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Micky Knox
Wisconsin-Stout · 2010-11
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dan Krug
Buffalo State · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Lynes
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
0.294 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.