IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nate Chase Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-09-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Boston Jr. Bandits EHL 44 4 10 14 0.318 0.0683 0.0690 0.1558 0.1575
2015-16 Boston Jr. Bandits EHL 40 17 26 43 1.075 0.2307 0.2231 0.5264 0.5090
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Wentworth D3 CNE SR 28 9 17 26 0.929
2018-19 Wentworth D3 CNE JR 23 12 12 24 1.044
2017-18 Wentworth D3 CNE SO 18 6 10 16 0.889
2016-17 Wentworth D3 CNE FR 9 1 2 3 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2016-17 · Wentworth
+141.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25376
Forward overall
#1020
Forward born in 1995
#366
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brad Michalchuk
Middlebury · 2001-02
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Melso
SUNY Geneseo · 2022-23
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
C.J. Stubbs
Morrisville · 2014-15
0.870 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.