IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dominic Blad Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-03-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier-Classic 29 3 3 6 0.207 0.0621 0.0620 0.1704 0.1701
2015-16 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier-Classic 24 2 2 4 0.167 0.0501 0.0475 0.1373 0.1303
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Western New England D3 CNE — 22 5 7 12 0.545
2018-19 Western New England D3 CNE — 3 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast SO 20 2 3 5 0.250
2016-17 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast FR 8 0 2 2 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2016-17 · UMass Boston
+448.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#50533
Forward overall
#2239
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Dau
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Air Force (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luke French
Bethel · 2021-22
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Sawyer Wirsing
Concordia Wisconsin · 2022-23
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Theo Hannah
Amherst · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.