← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sawyer Wirsing Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-04-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 15 1 1 2 0.133 0.0286 0.0289 0.0653 0.0659
2022-23 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 37 9 4 13 0.351 0.0754 0.0722 0.1721 0.1648
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Concordia D3 MIAC GR 23 1 4 5 0.217
2025-26 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA JR 23 1 4 5 0.217
2024-25 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 21 3 2 5 0.238
2024-25 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA SO 21 3 2 5 0.238
2023-24 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 27 5 5 10 0.370
2023-24 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA FR 27 5 5 10 0.370
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2023-24 · Concordia
+688.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#50192
Forward overall
#2604
Forward born in 2002
#2123
in EHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Michael's · 2008-09
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nichols · 2010-11
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2021-22
0.238 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.