IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Liam Neuman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-08-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Brockville Braves CCHL 29 5 7 12 0.414 0.0898 0.0923 0.3203 0.3293
2014-15 Aurora Tigers OJHL 51 15 16 31 0.608 0.1490 0.1451 0.4160 0.4052
2015-16 Aurora Tigers OJHL 51 11 27 38 0.745 0.1826 0.1678 0.5100 0.4686
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 New England D1 — SR 22 3 10 13 0.591
2019-20 New England D3 — SR 22 3 10 13 0.591
2018-19 New England D1 — JR 30 5 15 20 0.667
2018-19 New England D3 — JR 30 5 15 20 0.667
2017-18 New England D3 — SO 29 6 7 13 0.448
2016-17 New England D3 — FR 16 1 0 1 0.062
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2016-17 · New England
-54.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31737
Forward overall
#1292
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Braden Hellems
Adrian · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Finn Theriault
Nazareth · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Mead
Becker · 2018-19
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.