← New Search ↗ Social Card

Austin Aksoy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-11-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Rochester Jr. Americans USPHL-Premier-Classic 33 5 8 13 0.394 0.1106 0.1084 0.3244 0.3180
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Lake Forest D1 SR 27 11 11 22 0.815
2019-20 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SR 27 11 11 22 0.815
2018-19 Lake Forest D1 JR 28 3 10 13 0.464
2018-19 Lake Forest D3 NCHA JR 28 3 10 13 0.464
2017-18 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SO 25 4 7 11 0.440
2016-17 Lake Forest D3 NCHA FR 7 0 1 1 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2016-17 · Lake Forest
+54.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#44361
Forward overall
#1899
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2008-09
0.316 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2010-11
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.