← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dustin Cordeiro Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-04-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Elliot Lake Bobcats NOJHL 44 13 11 24 0.545 0.0911 0.0976 0.2271 0.2432
2013-14 Elliot Lake Bobcats NOJHL 56 23 27 50 0.893 0.1491 0.1526 0.3717 0.3804
2014-15 Iroquois Falls Storm NOJHL 46 47 18 65 1.413 0.2360 0.2279 0.5882 0.5679
2015-16 Iroquois Falls Storm NOJHL 54 39 47 86 1.593 0.2660 0.2441 0.6630 0.6084
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 St. Scholastica D1 MIAC SR 19 3 5 8 0.421
2019-20 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SR 19 3 5 8 0.421
2018-19 St. Scholastica D1 MIAC JR 23 5 4 9 0.391
2018-19 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC JR 23 5 4 9 0.391
2017-18 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SO 12 3 1 4 0.333
2016-17 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC FR 9 0 1 1 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2016-17 · St. Scholastica
-45.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13794
Forward overall
#551
Forward born in 1995
#48
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2021-22
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2007-08
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.