IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Frank Pinho Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-02-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 New Jersey Rockets EHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2014-15 New Jersey Rockets EHL 30 6 4 10 0.333 0.0488 0.0480 0.1633 0.1606
2015-16 Connecticut Jr. Rangers USPHL-Premier-Classic 38 3 4 7 0.184 0.0517 0.0488 0.1515 0.1430
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Stevenson D1 MAC SR 8 1 0 1 0.125
2019-20 Stevenson D3 MAC SR 8 1 0 1 0.125
2018-19 Stevenson D1 MAC JR 13 1 1 2 0.154
2018-19 Stevenson D3 MAC JR 13 1 1 2 0.154
2017-18 Stevenson D3 MAC SO 3 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Stevenson D3 MAC FR 5 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#51490
Forward overall
#2280
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Derek Myronuk
Lake Forest · 2000-01
0.176 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Clay Van Diest
St. Norbert · 2014-15
0.310 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Kaleta
SUNY Cortland · 2008-09
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.