IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Declan Chapman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Pomfret NE-Prep 28 2 2 4 0.143 0.0283 0.0283 0.0651 0.0651
2021-22 Pomfret NE-Prep 23 15 12 27 1.174 0.2325 0.2325 0.5348 0.5348
2022-23 — NCDC 39 4 4 8 0.205 0.0836 0.0825 0.1649 0.1627
2023-24 Worcester Jr. Railers EHL 38 9 11 20 0.526 0.1216 0.1156 0.2575 0.2448
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Assumption D2 NE10 — 20 3 5 8 0.400
2024-25 Assumption D2 NE10 — 26 3 4 7 0.269
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2024-25 · Assumption
+207.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28395
Forward overall
#1634
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sebastian Rogles
Saint Anselm · 2024-25
0.433 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Sanderson
Babson · 2017-18
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ethan DeMumbrum
Salem State · 2021-22
0.259 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.