IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Friesen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-11-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Selkirk Steelers MJHL 6 0 2 2 0.333 0.0642 0.0642 0.2102 0.2102
2021-22 Selkirk Steelers MJHL 32 1 1 2 0.062 0.0120 0.0121 0.0394 0.0396
2022-23 — NOJHL 52 17 19 36 0.692 0.1156 0.1095 0.2882 0.2729
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Arizona State ACHA_D1 NCHC — 28 1 9 10 0.357
2024-25 Arizona State ACHA_D1 NCHC — 28 1 9 10 0.357
2023-24 Arizona State ACHA_D1 NCHC — 28 1 9 10 0.357
2022-23 Arizona State ACHA_D1 NCHC — 28 1 9 10 0.357
2021-22 Arizona State ACHA_D1 NCHC — 28 1 9 10 0.357
2020-21 Arizona State ACHA_D1 NCHC — 28 1 9 10 0.357

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#44260
Forward overall
#2802
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Fudger
SUNY Oswego · 2021-22
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Evan Lugo
Post · 2016-17
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Gargin
Franklin Pierce · 2014-15
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.