IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hadan Jordan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-10-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Boston Jr. Bandits EHL 40 3 4 7 0.175 0.0376 0.0385 0.0857 0.0877
2016-17 Boston Jr. Bandits EHL 30 0 15 15 0.500 0.1073 0.1050 0.2449 0.2396
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Saint Michael's D2 — SR 26 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Saint Michael's D2 — JR 26 0 5 5 0.192
2017-18 Saint Michael's D2 — SO 22 2 5 7 0.318
2016-17 Saint Michael's D2 — FR 5 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#15595
Defenseman overall
#2025
Defenseman born in 1996
#1566
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Garret Peterson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ Army (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Zink
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Flynn
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tristan Fasig
Hobart · 2021-22
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Noel Rahn
Saint John's · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Riley See
Fredonia · 2023-24
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.