IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hadan Jordan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-10-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Boston Jr. Bandits EHL 40 3 4 7 0.175 0.0404 0.0414 0.0856 0.0876
2016-17 Boston Jr. Bandits EHL 30 0 15 15 0.500 0.1155 0.1130 0.2447 0.2394
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 St. Michael's College D1 — SR 26 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 St. Michael's College D2 — SR 26 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 St. Michael's College D1 — JR 26 0 5 5 0.192
2018-19 St. Michael's College D2 — JR 26 0 5 5 0.192
2017-18 St. Michael's College D2 — SO 22 2 5 7 0.318
2016-17 St. Michael's College D2 — FR 5 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#13239
Defenseman overall
#1810
Defenseman born in 1996
#1672
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tristan Fasig
Hobart · 2021-22
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Ohlund
New England College · 2024-25
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Johnson
Nichols · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.