IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick White Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-01-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Topeka Capitals NA3HL 9 2 4 6 0.667 0.0837 0.0846 0.2105 0.2126
2014-15 East Coast Wizards EHL 38 4 7 11 0.289 0.0669 0.0655 0.1417 0.1388
2015-16 East Coast Wizards EHL 32 2 4 6 0.188 0.0433 0.0405 0.0917 0.0858
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Chatham D3 UCHC — 4 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC — 9 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#20418
Defenseman overall
#2263
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sterling Wolters
SUNY Geneseo · 2022-23
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Eemil Rautio
Marian · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jacob Skolnik
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2018-19
0.296 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.