IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eemil Rautio Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-01-16 Country: Finland
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 HPK U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 36 4 2 6 0.167 0.0904 0.0915 0.2476 0.2506
2022-23 Ilves U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 36 5 9 14 0.389 0.2108 0.2042 0.5776 0.5596
2023-24 Ilves U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 19 0 4 4 0.210 0.1141 0.1045 0.3126 0.2862
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Marian D3 NCHA SO 27 8 10 18 0.667
2024-25 Marian D3 NCHA — 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38658
Forward overall
#2404
Forward born in 2003
#1170
in SM-Liiga-Jr

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Magill-Diaz
Trine · 2017-18
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Keenan Schneider
Stevenson · 2024-25
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Vincent
St. Thomas · 2018-19
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.