IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Myles Mason Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-11-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 International Falls USHS-MN 26 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 International Falls USHS-MN 18 7 5 12 0.667 0.0821 0.0821 — —
2021-22 Swan Valley Stampeders MJHL 48 3 5 8 0.167 0.0321 0.0323 0.1051 0.1057
2022-23 Swan Valley Stampeders MJHL 58 11 16 27 0.466 0.0896 0.0859 0.2934 0.2813
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Nichols D3 CNE GR 10 0 1 1 0.100
2024-25 Nichols D3 CNE SR 20 0 1 1 0.050
2023-24 Nichols D3 CNE JR 21 1 1 2 0.095
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2023-24 · Nichols
+72.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#43852
Forward overall
#2781
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joe Knoepke
Wisconsin-Stout · 2008-09
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Serdachny
Manhattanville · 2008-09
0.348 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Hughes
Lawrence · 2007-08
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.