IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mark Tomaschek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-05-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Elite 42 3 15 18 0.429 0.0514 0.0507 0.0984 0.0971
2015-16 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Elite 33 10 13 23 0.697 0.0836 0.0786 0.1600 0.1504
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast SR 27 2 7 9 0.333
2018-19 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast JR 23 3 3 6 0.261
2017-18 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast SO 21 1 2 3 0.143
2016-17 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast FR 22 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#46102
Forward overall
#2005
Forward born in 1995
#543
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brody Decker
Concordia Wisconsin · 2013-14
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Steve Hoffart
Manhattanville · 2001-02
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jesse Farabee
SUNY Oswego · 2016-17
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.