← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brody Decker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-05-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 NAHL 11 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 13 0 3 3 0.231 0.0848 0.0797 0.2436 0.2288
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 27 4 5 9 0.333
2017-18 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA SR 27 4 5 9 0.333
2016-17 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 16 2 3 5 0.312
2016-17 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA JR 16 2 3 5 0.312
2015-16 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 3 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA SO 3 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 25 5 11 16 0.640
2014-15 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA FR 25 5 11 16 0.640
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2014-15 · Concordia
+838.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#56757
Forward overall
#2195
Forward born in 1993
#6543
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2016-17
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2010-11
0.310 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2015-16
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.