IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Troy Taylor Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-05-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2013-14 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 14 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2014-15 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 18 0 5 5 0.278 0.0776 0.0748 0.1917 0.1849
2015-16 — OJHL 43 3 10 13 0.302 0.0845 0.0768 0.2086 0.1896
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Castleton D3 LittleEast SR 26 2 16 18 0.692
2018-19 Castleton D3 LittleEast JR 21 3 8 11 0.524
2017-18 Castleton D3 LittleEast SO 18 1 10 11 0.611
2016-17 Castleton D3 LittleEast FR 21 3 13 16 0.762
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.76
2016-17 · Castleton
+958.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18542
Defenseman overall
#2108
Defenseman born in 1995
#4868
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mitchell Allen
Middlebury · 2015-16
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Robert Dysart
Wesleyan · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitchell McPherson
Hamline · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.