IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jackson Miller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-05-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Woodbury USHS-MN 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 Woodbury USHS-MN 19 0 3 3 0.158 0.0195 0.0195 0.0384 0.0384
2021-22 Woodbury USHS-MN 26 2 7 9 0.346 0.0427 0.0427 0.0841 0.0841
2022-23 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 15 2 1 3 0.200 0.0221 0.0229 0.0634 0.0656
2023-24 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 18 0 1 1 0.056 0.0061 0.0060 0.0176 0.0174
2024-25 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 47 3 19 22 0.468 0.0518 0.0484 0.1483 0.1386
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hamline D3 MIAC — 7 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23392
Defenseman overall
#3830
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josh Wright
Trine · 2021-22
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hayden Taylor
Manhattanville · 2018-19
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Simpson
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2013-14
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.