IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Wright Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-06-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Trenton Golden Hawks OJHL 43 3 11 14 0.326 0.0798 0.0798 0.2229 0.2229
2020-21 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0771 0.0771 0.2914 0.2914
2021-22 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 39 2 8 10 0.256 0.0988 0.0914 0.3736 0.3458
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Trine D3 NCHA SR 26 1 10 11 0.423
2024-25 Trine D3 NCHA JR 29 7 8 15 0.517
2023-24 Trine D3 NCHA SO 21 6 11 17 0.809
2022-23 Trine D3 NCHA FR 24 3 10 13 0.542
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2022-23 · Trine
+527.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17595
Defenseman overall
#2802
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ross Johnson
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2004-05
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Costley
St. Norbert · 2000-01
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nico Gonzalez
SUNY Cortland · 2015-16
0.524 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.