IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Peavey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-06-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 — NOJHL 38 12 15 27 0.711 0.1210 0.1189 0.3011 0.2958
2014-15 Iroquois Falls Storm NOJHL 11 2 6 8 0.727 0.1239 0.1145 0.3082 0.2849
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Finlandia D1 — SR 25 2 5 7 0.280
2019-20 Finlandia D3 — SR 25 2 5 7 0.280
2018-19 Finlandia D1 — JR 27 2 3 5 0.185
2018-19 Finlandia D3 — JR 27 2 3 5 0.185
2017-18 Finlandia D3 — SO 25 2 6 8 0.320
2016-17 Bethel D3 MIAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Bethel D3 MIAC — 21 0 4 4 0.191
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2015-16 · Bethel
+91.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#40779
Forward overall
#1624
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gustav Sandberg
Nichols · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Chad Merrell
University of New England · 2018-19
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Selan
Manhattanville · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.