IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Galloway Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-08-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Texas Jr. Brahmas NA3HL 47 28 35 63 1.340 0.3083 0.3209 0.4246 0.4420
2016-17 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 45 6 13 19 0.422 0.1486 0.1514 0.2070 0.2109
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Southern New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast JR 24 7 6 13 0.542
2019-20 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 JR 24 7 6 13 0.542
2018-19 Southern New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast SO 27 5 6 11 0.407
2018-19 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 SO 27 5 6 11 0.407
2017-18 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 FR 20 4 6 10 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2017-18 · Southern New Hampshire
+166.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26036
Forward overall
#1176
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cam Wright
Stonehill · 2015-16
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Peter Smith
Bowdoin · 2025-26
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brian Lange
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.