IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sean Allen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-01-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Connecticut Jr. Rangers USPHL-Premier-Classic 46 3 20 23 0.500 0.1404 0.1461 0.4118 0.4284
2015-16 Connecticut Jr. Rangers USPHL-Premier-Classic 44 3 14 17 0.386 0.1085 0.1076 0.3182 0.3155
2016-17 Brockville Braves CCHL 59 4 24 28 0.475 0.1515 0.1370 0.3674 0.3323
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Hamilton D3 NESCAC JR 23 1 12 13 0.565
2018-19 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SO 20 1 7 8 0.400
2017-18 Hamilton D3 NESCAC FR 20 2 8 10 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2017-18 · Hamilton
+323.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12279
Defenseman overall
#1733
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Smith
Worcester State · 2001-02
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Vaden McManus
Utica · 2016-17
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Zack Olen
Lawrence · 2018-19
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.