IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zach Pamaylaon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-02-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 3 1 0 1 0.333 0.0770 0.0795 0.1631 0.1683
2015-16 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 24 1 2 3 0.125 0.0289 0.0286 0.0612 0.0605
2016-17 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 32 2 4 6 0.188 0.0433 0.0408 0.0917 0.0865
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Bryn Athyn D1 — JR 22 6 9 15 0.682
2019-20 Bryn Athyn D3 — JR 22 6 9 15 0.682
2018-19 Bryn Athyn D1 — SO 23 2 8 10 0.435
2018-19 Bryn Athyn D3 — SO 23 2 8 10 0.435
2017-18 Bryn Athyn D3 — FR 17 5 4 9 0.529
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2017-18 · Bryn Athyn
+1624.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#56355
Forward overall
#2739
Forward born in 1996
#2843
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Justin Giles
Wisconsin-Stout · 2008-09
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Storm Wahlrab
St. Norbert · 2014-15
0.433 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Conway
St. Olaf · 2018-19
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.