IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nate Rogers Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-12-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2016-17 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 42 14 10 24 0.571 0.1226 0.1208 0.2798 0.2756
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — SR 12 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — JR 15 3 3 6 0.400
2018-19 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — SO 27 3 3 6 0.222
2017-18 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — FR 18 2 7 9 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2017-18 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
+383.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#32993
Forward overall
#1461
Forward born in 1996
#783
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Dau
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Air Force (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Fudger
SUNY Oswego · 2021-22
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tristan Morin
Curry · 2016-17
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Hughes
Lawrence · 2007-08
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.