IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Perkett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-03-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 New York Bobcats EHL 31 2 7 9 0.290 0.1022 0.1015 0.1423 0.1413
2016-17 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 47 6 8 14 0.298 0.1048 0.0993 0.1461 0.1385
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Bryn Athyn D3 — JR 25 1 9 10 0.400
2018-19 Bryn Athyn D3 — SO 20 2 2 4 0.200
2017-18 Bryn Athyn D3 — FR 22 2 7 9 0.409
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2017-18 · Bryn Athyn
+332.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16428
Defenseman overall
#2096
Defenseman born in 1996
#2043
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Amraj Gill
Concordia (WI) · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Angus Scott
Tufts · 2017-18
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tim Donohue
Gustavus Adolphus · 2013-14
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.