IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Martyn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-10-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Premier-Classic 42 6 10 16 0.381 0.1069 0.1099 0.3138 0.3227
2016-17 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Premier-Classic 45 4 16 20 0.444 0.1247 0.1222 0.3660 0.3585
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Fredonia D3 — JR 25 4 5 9 0.360
2018-19 Fredonia D3 — SO 26 1 8 9 0.346
2017-18 Fredonia D3 — FR 26 0 7 7 0.269
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2017-18 · Fredonia
+143.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14464
Defenseman overall
#1931
Defenseman born in 1996
#202
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Bartfield
Skidmore · 2024-25
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
David DuBord
St. Thomas · 2000-01
0.679 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Donnie Hallmark
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2008-09
0.607 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.