← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dillon Radin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-07-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 New York Apple Core EHL 38 11 9 20 0.526 0.1852 0.1875 0.2580 0.2612
2016-17 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs EHL 40 17 15 32 0.800 0.2815 0.2722 0.3922 0.3793
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 UMass Dartmouth D3 GR 25 11 24 35 1.400
2020-21 UMass Dartmouth D1 HockeyEast SR 3 2 3 5 1.667
2020-21 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast SR 3 2 3 5 1.667
2019-20 UMass Dartmouth D1 HockeyEast JR 28 13 13 26 0.929
2019-20 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast JR 28 13 13 26 0.929
2018-19 UMass Dartmouth D1 HockeyEast SO 25 3 6 9 0.360
2018-19 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast SO 25 3 6 9 0.360
2017-18 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast FR 18 3 3 6 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2017-18 · UMass Dartmouth
+63.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22209
Forward overall
#885
Forward born in 1996
#542
in EHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2008-09
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Arcadia · 2021-22
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.