← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joseph Richardson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-01-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 P.A.L. Junior Islanders USPHL-Premier-Classic 35 0 4 4 0.114 0.0321 0.0333 0.0941 0.0978
2015-16 P.A.L. Junior Islanders USPHL-Premier-Classic 40 2 19 21 0.525 0.1474 0.1459 0.4324 0.4280
2016-17 P.A.L. Junior Islanders USPHL-Premier-Classic 45 3 22 25 0.556 0.1560 0.1468 0.4576 0.4307
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Potsdam D1 JR 27 2 9 11 0.407
2019-20 SUNY Potsdam D3 JR 27 2 9 11 0.407
2018-19 Potsdam D1 SO 25 4 8 12 0.480
2018-19 SUNY Potsdam D3 SO 25 4 8 12 0.480
2017-18 SUNY Potsdam D3 FR 23 1 5 6 0.261
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2017-18 · SUNY Potsdam
+88.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13413
Defenseman overall
#1842
Defenseman born in 1996
#180
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2017-18
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2017-18
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.