IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Thamert Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-11-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 — USPHL-Elite 37 16 11 27 0.730 0.0875 0.0889 0.1675 0.1701
2016-17 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 43 12 15 27 0.628 0.1347 0.1325 0.3075 0.3025
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Chatham D3 UCHC SR 11 2 1 3 0.273
2019-20 Chatham D3 UCHC JR 9 0 1 1 0.111
2018-19 Chatham D3 UCHC SO 21 5 1 6 0.286
2017-18 Chatham D3 UCHC FR 23 2 2 4 0.174
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2017-18 · Chatham
+76.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#34614
Forward overall
#1549
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Donaldson
SUNY Potsdam · 2014-15
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Burr
New England · 2015-16
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joel Lenius
Fredonia · 2006-07
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.