IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Thamert Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-11-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 — USPHL-Elite 37 16 11 27 0.730 0.0674 0.0684 0.1671 0.1697
2016-17 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 43 12 15 27 0.628 0.1450 0.1426 0.3072 0.3022
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Chatham D1 UCHC SR 11 2 1 3 0.273
2020-21 Chatham D3 UCHC SR 11 2 1 3 0.273
2019-20 Chatham D1 UCHC JR 9 0 1 1 0.111
2019-20 Chatham D3 UCHC JR 9 0 1 1 0.111
2018-19 Chatham D1 UCHC SO 21 5 1 6 0.286
2018-19 Chatham D3 UCHC SO 21 5 1 6 0.286
2017-18 Chatham D3 UCHC FR 23 2 2 4 0.174
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2017-18 · Chatham
+79.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31301
Forward overall
#1317
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Donaldson
SUNY Potsdam · 2014-15
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Burr
University of New England · 2015-16
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Eoin Reager
Post · 2023-24
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.