IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Lang Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-10-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Selkirk Steelers MJHL 56 11 7 18 0.321 0.0619 0.0619 0.2027 0.2025
2024-25 Great Falls Americans NA3HL 39 20 29 49 1.256 0.1577 0.1502 0.3966 0.3778
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Mary ACHA_D1 — — 25 1 8 9 0.360
2024-25 University of Mary ACHA_D1 — — 25 1 8 9 0.360
2023-24 University of Mary ACHA_D1 — — 25 1 8 9 0.360
2022-23 University of Mary ACHA_D1 — — 25 1 8 9 0.360
2021-22 University of Mary ACHA_D1 — — 25 1 8 9 0.360
2020-21 University of Mary ACHA_D1 — — 25 1 8 9 0.360

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27434
Forward overall
#1594
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aaron Degerness
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2001-02
0.903 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Will Robertson
Lawrence · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Gunther Stange
Worcester State · 2017-18
0.238 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.